Whitewater vs. Watergate :: American America History

Whitewater vs. Watergate. Both are semipolitical sandals that have rocked the nation. As Watergate unraveled, many of Nixons dirty tactics were learned, including assorted lists of enemies (a number of which became targets of IRS revenue audits), wiretapping, political sabotage, burglary, blackballing, and daub campaigns. Similarly, as Whitewater unfolded, the scandal appeared to involve more than just an illegal loan. It touched on possible hush money paid to witnesses and includes the attainment of more than 900 hugger-mugger FBI files on Bush and Reagan appointees. In many aspects, the two are very similar. They are alike in the cover-ups they both produced. But they whitewash are just about two totally different events. Each of these scandals is associated with a central flagitious event and both involved a web of political intrigue.1First, what were Whitewater and Watergate? Whitewater started as a land growth of riverfront property in Arkansas in the 1980s. The Clinton s received a large share of the development without putting up any money. The development went bad, so additional capital was needed. There is evidence and testimony suggesting that this cash was obtained illegally from the federal government and never paid back. As for Watergate - though it was revealed by the Senate Watergate committee as an unprecedented abuse of presidential power that was extremely dangerous to the country, it is remembered 25 years later as a strange and frustrated burglary in the Watergate office building by people linked to the reelection committee of Nixon. But Watergate was so much more than a political burglary. The Senate hearings showed Watergate was composed of ageless criminality by the Nixon White House, and was driven by an extreme commitment to maintain control of power by any means, including criminal conduct. It included the stop of a psychiatrists office for the purpose of smearing Daniel Elsberg - the leaker of the Pentagon Papers the misuse of the IRS and other federal agencies to punish those on the presidents enemies list the illegal wiretapping of journalists and members of Nixons own cheek and the purposeful alter of government documents to enhance a political agenda.2Many similarities come up when discussing Whitewater and Watergate. The scandals may be separated by two decades, and much mockery is evident when they are compared. For example, in 1974, Hillary Rodham was employed as a lawyer by the House Judiciary Committees impeachment inquiry, along with Bernard Nussbaum, former party boss counsel at the Clinton White House.Whitewater vs. Watergate American America HistoryWhitewater vs. Watergate. Both are political sandals that have rocked the nation. As Watergate unraveled, many of Nixons dirty tactics were learned, including assorted lists of enemies (a number of which became targets of IRS tax audits), wiretapping, political sabotage, burglary, blackballing, and smear campaigns. Similarly, as Whitewa ter unfolded, the scandal appeared to involve more than just an illegal loan. It touched on possible hush money paid to witnesses and includes the acquisition of more than 900 confidential FBI files on Bush and Reagan appointees. In many aspects, the two are very similar. They are alike in the cover-ups they both produced. But they still are about two totally different events. Each of these scandals is associated with a central criminal event and both involved a web of political intrigue.1First, what were Whitewater and Watergate? Whitewater started as a land development of riverfront property in Arkansas in the 1980s. The Clintons received a large share of the development without putting up any money. The development went bad, so additional capital was needed. There is evidence and testimony suggesting that this cash was obtained illegally from the federal government and never paid back. As for Watergate - though it was revealed by the Senate Watergate committee as an unprecedented abuse of presidential power that was extremely dangerous to the country, it is remembered 25 years later as a strange and unsuccessful burglary in the Watergate office building by people linked to the reelection committee of Nixon. But Watergate was so much more than a political burglary. The Senate hearings showed Watergate was composed of constant criminality by the Nixon White House, and was driven by an extreme commitment to maintain control of power by any means, including criminal conduct. It included the break-in of a psychiatrists office for the purpose of smearing Daniel Elsberg - the leaker of the Pentagon Papers the misuse of the IRS and other federal agencies to punish those on the presidents enemies list the illegal wiretapping of journalists and members of Nixons own administration and the purposeful editing of government documents to enhance a political agenda.2Many similarities come up when discussing Whitewater and Watergate. The scandals may be separated by two de cades, but much irony is evident when they are compared. For example, in 1974, Hillary Rodham was employed as a lawyer by the House Judiciary Committees impeachment inquiry, along with Bernard Nussbaum, former chief counsel at the Clinton White House.